返回顶部
🇺🇸 English
🇨🇳 简体中文
🇨🇳 繁體中文
🇺🇸 English
🇯🇵 日本語
🇰🇷 한국어
🇫🇷 Français
🇩🇪 Deutsch
🇪🇸 Español
🇷🇺 Русский
a

adi-decision-engine

Structured multi-criteria decision analysis for ranking options with weights, constraints, confidence, tradeoff reasoning, sensitivity analysis, and explainable recommendations. Use when the user asks for decision support, MCDA, weighted scoring, prioritization, vendor selection, route planning, hiring shortlist ranking, tool comparison, procurement decisions, or auditable agent decision logic.

作者: admin | 来源: ClawHub
源自
ClawHub
版本
V 0.1.0
安全检测
已通过
332
下载量
免费
免费
0
收藏
概述
安装方式
版本历史

adi-decision-engine

# ADI Decision Engine ## Core promise Turn a messy tradeoff problem into a structured, auditable multi-criteria decision and return a ranked recommendation with confidence and explanation. ## When to use this skill Use this skill when the user needs structured decision support rather than open-ended brainstorming. Typical triggers include: - multi-criteria decision analysis - weighted scoring or option ranking - vendor selection or procurement - route planning with explicit tradeoffs - hiring shortlist ranking - tool or platform comparison - policy-driven or auditable agent decisions ## Input modes This skill supports exactly two input modes. ### 1. Structured mode The user already has a decision request with: - `options` - `criteria` - optional `constraints` - optional `policy_name` - optional evidence, confidence, or context Use [scripts/validate_request.py](scripts/validate_request.py) first if request quality is uncertain, then [scripts/run_adi.py](scripts/run_adi.py) to execute it. ### 2. Freeform mode The user provides a natural-language tradeoff problem. First use [scripts/normalize_problem.py](scripts/normalize_problem.py) to produce a request skeleton. Do not pretend the request is complete if important fields are missing. If the skeleton is not ready, ask for the missing inputs instead of inventing scores or constraints. ## Output contract If ADI runs successfully, the final answer must contain: - `best_option` - a short rationale for why it won - top-ranked alternatives - confidence summary - constraint impact summary - sensitivity or stability summary when available - explicit assumptions If the request is not complete enough to run, return a request-completion prompt rather than a fabricated ranking. ## Workflow 1. Determine whether the user input is structured or freeform. 2. For freeform input, normalize it into a request skeleton using [scripts/normalize_problem.py](scripts/normalize_problem.py). 3. Validate candidate requests with [scripts/validate_request.py](scripts/validate_request.py). 4. Run complete requests with [scripts/run_adi.py](scripts/run_adi.py). 5. Present the ADI result in clear decision-support language: - recommendation first - strongest tradeoff second - caveats and sensitivity after that ## Decision hygiene rules - Never rank options without explicit criteria. - Never silently invent hard constraints. - If criterion direction is ambiguous, stop and clarify. - Normalize vague goals into named criteria before scoring. - Prefer a small, explicit criteria set over many overlapping criteria. - Keep the policy choice visible: `balanced`, `risk_averse`, or `exploratory`. ## Output quality rules - Show the top recommendation first. - Explain why it won. - Mention the strongest tradeoff. - Call out eliminated or constraint-violating options. - Include confidence caveats when evidence is weak. - Use a compact comparison table or structured bullet list when comparing several options. ## Safety and honesty rules - No hidden math. - No fake scores. - No fabricated evidence. - Do not claim ADI ran if the runtime dependency is missing. - Do not request API keys. - Do not require network access for the core workflow. - Do not tell the user to trust the ranking if the request is under-specified. ## Runtime requirements - `python3` - either an importable `adi-decision` package or the `adi` CLI on `PATH` If the ADI runtime is unavailable, stop with a clear error and explain that the dependency must be installed locally. ## References - Request schema: [references/request_schema.md](references/request_schema.md) - Result interpretation: [references/result_interpretation.md](references/result_interpretation.md) - Policy guide: [references/policy_guide.md](references/policy_guide.md) - Use cases: [references/use_cases.md](references/use_cases.md) ## Examples - [examples/vendor_selection.json](examples/vendor_selection.json) - [examples/route_planning.json](examples/route_planning.json) - [examples/hiring_shortlist.json](examples/hiring_shortlist.json) - [examples/research_methods.json](examples/research_methods.json) - [examples/tool_selection.json](examples/tool_selection.json)

标签

skill ai

通过对话安装

该技能支持在以下平台通过对话安装:

OpenClaw WorkBuddy QClaw Kimi Claude

方式一:安装 SkillHub 和技能

帮我安装 SkillHub 和 adi-decision-engine-1776286700 技能

方式二:设置 SkillHub 为优先技能安装源

设置 SkillHub 为我的优先技能安装源,然后帮我安装 adi-decision-engine-1776286700 技能

通过命令行安装

skillhub install adi-decision-engine-1776286700

下载

⬇ 下载 adi-decision-engine v0.1.0(免费)

文件大小: 17.66 KB | 发布时间: 2026-4-16 17:02

v0.1.0 最新 2026-4-16 17:02
Initial public release of the ADI Decision Engine OpenClaw skill bundle.

Archiver·手机版·闲社网·闲社论坛·羊毛社区· 多链控股集团有限公司 · 苏ICP备2025199260号-1

Powered by Discuz! X5.0   © 2024-2025 闲社网·线报更新论坛·羊毛分享社区·http://xianshe.com

p2p_official_large
返回顶部